| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump -i wording |
| Date: | 2008-03-23 01:21:51 |
| Message-ID: | 25613.1206235311@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I have developed the attached patch with improves wording for the
> pg_dump -i (ignore version) option.
I think this is going in exactly the wrong direction --- it makes
both the documentation and the warning message less scary not more
so.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-23 01:23:24 | Re: Possible future performance improvement: sort updates/deletes by ctid |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-23 01:21:49 | Re: Idea for minor tstore optimization |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-23 01:35:35 | Re: tuplestore_putvalues() |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-23 01:10:22 | pg_dump -i wording |