Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ehm...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andrea gelmini <andrea(dot)gelmini(at)linux(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ehm...
Date: 2002-01-13 16:30:08
Message-ID: 25593.1010939408@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
andrea gelmini <andrea(dot)gelmini(at)linux(dot)it> writes:
> you was right, and there's no need of vacuum db to crash the postmaster...
> doing a fresh installation, a fresh initdb, starting my script (and a
> second bash script that does nothing more than a simple insert) after about
> 1 milion transactions i can see the problem (after changed sources as you told
> me), without vacuumdb.

Hm, you never did a VACUUM at all?  Don't see how that can be ---
removal of CLOG segments is triggered by VACUUM.

Please let me know if you can still see the problem with today's snapshot.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: ehm... at 2002-01-13 12:17:57 from andrea gelmini

Responses

  • Re: ehm... at 2002-01-16 12:58:07 from andrea gelmini

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Dirk LutzebaeckDate: 2002-01-13 20:52:38
Subject: cannot find attribute 1 of relation (of some user table) in 7.1.3
Previous:From: andrea gelminiDate: 2002-01-13 12:17:57
Subject: Re: ehm...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group