Re: TupleDescs and refcounts and such, again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: TupleDescs and refcounts and such, again
Date: 2006-12-27 23:29:47
Message-ID: 25564.1167262187@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> OK, I guess my only other question is to do with recursive/hierarchical
> queries: How will we handle those? All in same context?

Offhand I don't think it matters. Recursive queries are recursive in
the data, not in the plan tree.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-27 23:36:56 Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-27 23:26:47 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling of underflows,