Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem
Date: 2006-02-12 23:24:52
Message-ID: 25558.1139786692@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have applied the following patch for 8.2.  I have not applied to 8.1.X
> because it is a behavior change.

This patch broke the regression tests.  It seems to change the C-locale
behavior on many platforms.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-02-12 23:45:12
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Number format problem
Previous:From: Chris CampbellDate: 2006-02-12 21:33:27
Subject: Re: OS X shared memory documentation

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ken WinterDate: 2006-02-12 23:35:13
Subject: Why does an ON SELECT rule have to be named "_RETURN"?
Previous:From: Johan VromansDate: 2006-02-12 22:36:51
Subject: Re: Last modification time

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group