Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> AFAIK the GiST modifications suggested Aoki have not yet been 
>> implemented, so this should not have been removed.

> I thought that was an extremely vague limitation and could easily be 
> removed...  It's like having a limitations section on btrees and have 
> mentioning in passing that it can't do full text indexing or something.

Yeah, I agree.  It'd be appropriate to mention the Aoki paper in TODO,
but we don't normally document "stuff we'd like to do someday" as
serious limitations.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: pgsql: Remove GIST concurrency limitations section. at 2005-07-04 00:29:11 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Neil Conway	Date: 2005-07-04 02:56:02
	Subject: pgsql: Fix build break for out of tree (vpath) builds, induced by recent
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-07-04 02:02:01
	Subject: pgsql: Bruce, please apply this additional patch, that fixes the