Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Remove GIST concurrency limitations section.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Remove GIST concurrency limitations section.
Date: 2005-07-04 02:12:57
Message-ID: 2553.1120443177@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> AFAIK the GiST modifications suggested Aoki have not yet been 
>> implemented, so this should not have been removed.

> I thought that was an extremely vague limitation and could easily be 
> removed...  It's like having a limitations section on btrees and have 
> mentioning in passing that it can't do full text indexing or something.

Yeah, I agree.  It'd be appropriate to mention the Aoki paper in TODO,
but we don't normally document "stuff we'd like to do someday" as
serious limitations.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-07-04 02:56:02
Subject: pgsql: Fix build break for out of tree (vpath) builds, induced by recent
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-07-04 02:02:01
Subject: pgsql: Bruce, please apply this additional patch, that fixes the

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group