Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling of underflows,

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Roman Kononov <kononov195-pgsql(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling of underflows,
Date: 2006-12-27 23:26:47
Message-ID: 25525.1167262007@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Roman Kononov <kononov195-pgsql(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> In float4mul() and float4div(), the computation should be double precision.

Why?  It's going to have to fit in a float4 eventually anyway.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-27 23:29:47
Subject: Re: TupleDescs and refcounts and such, again
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2006-12-27 23:26:06
Subject: Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Roman KononovDate: 2006-12-27 23:47:05
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-27 23:19:31
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling of underflows,

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group