Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Call for platforms

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Knox <segfault(at)hardline(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date: 2001-03-30 04:58:25
Message-ID: 25368.985928305@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Mark Knox <segfault(at)hardline(dot)org> writes:
> Well, this patch seems to produce attlens of 6 as desired, but it
> causes many (13) of the regression tests to fail. Do you want to see
> the regression.diffs?
>> 
>> Please.

> See attached.

Does look pretty broken, but I don't see how my idea would have led to
all this other stuff failing.  Anyway, I guess the path of least
resistance is to install your ARM-specific packing patch.  It's
important to make sure that sizeof(ItemPointerData) is 6 if at all
possible, since it will cost you four or so wasted bytes in every
tuple header if it's not.  Will take care of it for RC2.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mikheev, VadimDate: 2001-03-30 05:17:50
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1
Previous:From: MatthewDate: 2001-03-30 04:56:19
Subject: RE: User administration tool

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group