Re: review: More frame options in window functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: More frame options in window functions
Date: 2010-02-12 14:40:48
Message-ID: 25325.1265985648@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
> Searching the archives ain't helping me refresh those memories. So it
> seems the case for an extended opclass infrastructure, or a new side
> one, is between thin an non-existent yet?

Yeah, I don't immediately see anything that would justify going to
that level of effort. Adding +/- as support functions for btree
seems like the thing to do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-02-12 14:42:58 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce the chatter to the log when starting a standby server.
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-02-12 14:34:29 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL