Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: parallel restore

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-01-04 17:14:38
Message-ID: 25267.1231089278@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I propose to commit this unless someone wants more time for reviewing.

A moment's eyeballing of the patch finds rather a lot of debugging cruft
yet (inserted printfs, "#ifdef WIN32blah", etc); also I think the
addition to include/port.h belongs in port/win32.h instead.

More generally, though, I think it hasn't been looked at much by
anyone (certainly not by me).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-01-04 17:28:22
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2009-01-04 16:40:21
Subject: Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group