Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: doc patch for savepoints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: doc patch for savepoints
Date: 2006-11-27 22:48:47
Message-ID: 25222.1164667727@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> writes:
> +   <para>
> +    Savepoints use shared memory.  If you use many savepoints without 
> releasing them, you
> +    will run out of shared memory and you may see an error like this in 
> your log:

I do not see the point of this.  Shall we put equivalent disclaimers
into every single construct that consumes shared memory?  There is no
such paragraph under LOCK TABLE, for example.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-11-27 22:52:15
Subject: Re: Configuring BLCKSZ and XLOGSEGSZ (in 8.3)
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2006-11-27 22:45:00
Subject: Re: Storing a dynahash for an entire connection or

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-11-27 22:52:15
Subject: Re: Configuring BLCKSZ and XLOGSEGSZ (in 8.3)
Previous:From: Joseph ShraibmanDate: 2006-11-27 22:08:45
Subject: doc patch for savepoints

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group