Re: [HACKERS] GPL code issue?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andreas Pflug" <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GPL code issue?
Date: 2003-10-01 03:39:15
Message-ID: 25221.1064979555@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> In src/backend/parser/parse.h there is a copyright that reads as below.
> Note the bottom section that says that the GPL is only excepted for
> files generated by Bison *from* this file. This implies to me that this
> file is GPL'd,

No. The text in question is copied verbatim from some Bison component
file that supplies a lot of fixed boilerplate for Bison output files.
It's not very well phrased, perhaps, but their intent is clearly to
exempt Bison output files from the GPL, and this *is* a Bison output
file.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Csomor 2003-10-01 07:07:56 Re: Mac Port
Previous Message Adam H.Pendleton 2003-09-30 22:43:38 Mac Port

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-01 04:06:38 Re: Wednesday beta postponed till Thursday
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-01 03:11:24 Wednesday beta postponed till Thursday