Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Date: 2003-02-24 19:35:34
Message-ID: 251960000.1046115334@lerlaptop.iadfw.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

--On Monday, February 24, 2003 11:11:34 -0800 Joe Conway 
<mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:

> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which
>> seems  rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value
>> (10000) would  swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.
>
> I don't recall (and cannot find in my sent mail) ever making that
> guesstimate. Can you provide some context?
It may be 6 **BYTES** per max_fsm_pages.


>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>



-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749




In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-02-24 19:55:45
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Previous:From: scott.marloweDate: 2003-02-24 19:34:00
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group