| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use |
| Date: | 2004-03-19 16:39:28 |
| Message-ID: | 25151.1079714368@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> In other words, the entire application either is or is not linked with
> threads; it's not a property of an individual library.
> SO, IF we are using the threads flags, we need to use them on ALL=20
> libpq-using programs, ours or the users.
Yeek. This is an example of the sort of thing that makes people want to
build two versions of every library.
I'm not excited about doing that (at least not unless it pops up on more
platforms). It seems that what we have to do for Unixware is add
-Kpthread to LDFLAGS; is that correct?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-19 16:41:45 | Re: Authentication drop-down? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-19 16:26:11 | 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-19 16:46:20 | Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-19 16:26:11 | 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8 |