Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 17:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we should just lose that test, as well as the variable.
> Yes, though it looks like it is still necessary in creating a valid
> initial state because otherwise we may have xids in KnownAssigned array
> that are already complete.
Huh? How is a filter as coarse as an oldest-running-XID filter going
to prevent that? And aren't we initializing from trustworthy data in
I still say it's useless.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-04-27 22:32:29|
|Subject: Schema.Table.Col resolution seems broken in Alpha5|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-04-27 21:45:53|
|Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance|