Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5735: pg_upgrade thinks that it did not start the old server

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Arturas Mazeika <mazeika(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5735: pg_upgrade thinks that it did not start the old server
Date: 2010-11-10 04:32:07
Message-ID: 25095.1289363527@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> On 10/30/2010 7:33 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>> upgrade from a 32bit 8.3 server to a 64 bit 9.0 server, which isn't
>>> going to work without a dump/restore. With pg_upgrade, the two builds
>>> need to be from the same platform, same word size, and have the same
>>> configuration for certain settings like integer_datetimes.

> Can anyone suggest a way pg_upgrade could detect an upgrade from a
> 32-bit to 64-bit cpu and throw an error?

Surely it does that already, as a result of comparing pg_control
contents.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Arturas MazeikaDate: 2010-11-10 06:37:16
Subject: Re: BUG #5735: pg_upgrade thinks that it did not start the old server
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-11-10 04:23:50
Subject: Re: BUG #5735: pg_upgrade thinks that it did not start the old server

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group