Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Foreign key referential action timing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Foreign key referential action timing
Date: 2004-10-21 21:36:36
Message-ID: 25095.1098394596@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> 	While not exactly what the spec invisions, I believe we can come
> closer to the correct behavior by treating all of the referential actions
> as non-deferrable while allowing deferment of NO ACTION and the check
> itself.

Since no one seems to have objected, I've applied this patch.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2004-10-21 21:54:33
Subject: Re: code question: storing INTO relation
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-21 20:28:46
Subject: Links to OSDL test results up

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group