Re: TB-sized databases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TB-sized databases
Date: 2008-03-18 14:49:32
Message-ID: 25024.1205851772@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
> Would another possible condition for considering
> Cartesian joins be be:

> * Consider Cartesian joins when a unique constraint can prove
> that at most one row will be pulled from one of the tables
> that would be part of this join?

What for? That would still lead us to consider large numbers of totally
useless joins.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Kratz 2008-03-18 15:35:08 Planner mis-estimation using nested loops followup
Previous Message Pablo Alcaraz 2008-03-18 13:07:13 Re: TB-sized databases