Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... indeed. Is it worth burdening the pg_stats mechanism with this?
>> The use case seems vanishingly thin.
> I am confused how this is different from inet_server_addr() and
I think the point is to let someone find out *from another session*
which server port number a particular session is using. I fail to see
a significant use case for that, though.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-05-28 14:21:23|
|Subject: Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-05-28 14:08:47|
|Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature|