From:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc:
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Subject:
Re: Application name patch - v4
Date:
2009-12-01 16:28:22
Message-ID:
2474.1259684902@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2009-11-26 15:50:15 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-11-28 23:47:49 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-11-29 00:27:14 from Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-11-29 01:34:16 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-11-29 00:51:21 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2009-11-29 17:00:54 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-11-29 17:22:31 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-11-29 20:03:24 from Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
2009-11-29 23:25:29 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-11-30 00:16:43 from "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
2009-11-30 07:20:46 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2009-11-30 21:11:11 from Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
2009-11-30 21:38:30 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-11-30 21:54:54 from Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
2009-11-30 22:06:12 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-11-30 23:59:09 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2009-12-01 00:11:13 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-01 00:26:32 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2009-12-01 08:59:17 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-12-01 09:11:49 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2009-12-01 09:16:45 from Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2009-12-01 09:18:39 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-12-01 16:19:34 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-01 16:23:59 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-12-01 16:28:22 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-01 16:33:54 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-12-01 16:52:31 from Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-12-01 18:25:22 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-01 20:07:06 from Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-12-01 20:18:31 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-01 21:08:06 from Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-12-01 21:20:12 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-01 21:30:53 from Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-12-02 05:09:14 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-02 08:14:47 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-12-02 08:34:25 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-12-02 15:19:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-01 09:22:13 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2009-12-01 10:46:15 from Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-12-01 11:54:03 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2009-12-01 08:13:58 from Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-12-01 09:30:03 from Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2009-11-30 01:01:55 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-11-30 01:20:02 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-11-30 02:21:59 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-11-30 03:20:53 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I don't think that we need to bump the protocol version. The real
>> alternative here would be that libpq sends a startup packet that
>> includes application_name, and if it gets an error back from that,
>> it starts over without the app name.
> I looked (briefly) at doing that when we first ran into this
> suggestion. As you pointed out at the time, it seemed like that would
> require some fairly ugly hackery in fe-connect.c
Perhaps, but at the time it wasn't apparent that issuing a separate SET
would create user-visible behavioral inconsistencies. Now that we've
realized that, I think we should reconsider.
If people are agreed that double connect is a better alternative
I'm willing to go look at how to make it happen.
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Dave PageDate: 2009-12-01 16:33:54Subject : Re: Application name patch - v4Previous :From : Scott MarloweDate : 2009-12-01 16:26:36Subject : Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Fwd: psql+krb5
