Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ?
Date: 2000-01-22 21:43:40
Message-ID: 24689.948577420@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> In fact, someone can just remove the #ifdef WARN_FROM defines around the
> code and regenerate the regression tests and all will stay in sync.

IIRC, Thomas felt that his outer join changes were going to break those
warnings anyway --- that's why we had them commented out.  No point in
trying to turn them on until the outer-join dust settles.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2000-01-22 23:18:03
Subject: Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ?
Previous:From: gavDate: 2000-01-22 21:15:52
Subject: how many inserts in one transaction?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group