Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Date: 2004-11-01 20:24:56
Message-ID: 24668.1099340696@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> [ proposed fix ]
> As you can see, this is quite a bit more complicated than the simple
> CreateProcess() call we have now.
> ...
> If this seems like a reasonable approach, I can see if I can get
> something together. But it's a fairly large change..

It sounds reasonable to me, in the sense that it is a localized change,
even if rather messy.  (Perhaps this chunk of code should be pushed into
src/port someplace, instead of being dropped into postmaster.c?)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-11-01 20:38:43
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-01 20:19:52
Subject: Re: UPDATE is not allowed in a non-volatile function

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-11-01 20:38:43
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-11-01 20:04:26
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group