| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: elog cleanup |
| Date: | 2002-02-19 05:43:06 |
| Message-ID: | 24654.1014097386@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> [ 100K+ patch ]
If you're going to hit every file in the backend in pursuit of this
idea, *puh-leeze* get it right the FIRST time, rather than subjecting
us all to multiple rounds of break-everyone-else's-patches-in-progress.
Things you did not get right include: where's the PG_ prefix?
And what happened to merging the debug-level mechanism with the
error level codes?
> o Add INFO level that prints only to the client
> o Add LOG level to print messages only to the server log
I still object strongly to this worldview. The code should not have
a hard-wired concept of which messages are for the client and which
are for the log.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-19 05:54:56 | Re: elog cleanup |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-19 05:41:53 | Re: elog cleanup |