Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type
Date: 2004-06-07 05:33:43
Message-ID: 24631.1086586423@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Yep, that's fine.  I believe someone said that we'd never removed one 
> before, but now we should be careful not to reuse the SET type OID?

Uh, why worry?  If you had an application that depended in any way
shape or form on the SET type, then I already broke it ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-06-07 05:48:53
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2004-06-07 05:23:33
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group