Re: xpath processing brain dead

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I'll do some tests to see what the cost of extra xml parsing might be.

> The extra cost appears to be fairly negligible.

Uh, you didn't actually show a comparison of before and after?
What it looks like to me is that this approach is free or nearly so for
well-formed documents, but doubles the parsing cost for forests.
Which is likely to annoy anyone who's really depending on the
capability.

Also,

> ! if (*VARDATA(xpath_expr_text) == '/')

This is risking a core dump if the xpath expr is of zero length. You
need something like

if (xpath_len > 0 && *VARDATA(xpath_expr_text) == '/')

It would also be a good idea if the allocation of string and xpath_expr
had a comment about why it's allocating extra space (something like "see
hacks below for use of this extra space" would be sufficient).

regards, tom lane