Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Андрей Репко <repko(at)sart(dot)must-ipra(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128.
Date: 2005-09-26 14:47:20
Message-ID: 24516.1127746040@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
[ looking again... ]

=?Windows-1251?Q?=C0=ED=E4=F0=E5=E9_=D0=E5=EF=EA=EE?= <repko(at)sart(dot)must-ipra(dot)com> writes:
> max_stack_depth = 65536                 # min 100, size in KB

Hmm, maybe this is the problem.  Are we sure Windows will allow a 64M stack?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-09-26 14:54:28
Subject: Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128.
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-09-26 14:44:33
Subject: Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group