Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patches for REL7_0_PATCHES

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patches for REL7_0_PATCHES
Date: 2000-11-02 07:30:19
Message-ID: 24472.973150219@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com> writes:
> fd.c.patch is a patch to reduce number of lseek syscalls.
> fe-misc.c.patch is a patch for libpq to cope with bugs in Linux kernel.
> pg_proc.c.patch is a patch for small memory leak in pg_proc.c.

The first of these is *certainly* inappropriate to apply as a backpatch,
and I have serious doubts about the other two as well.  We normally only
backpatch critical bug fixes, because dot-releases get almost no testing
before release.  I'm not convinced these are critical...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-11-02 16:49:38
Subject: Re: Small fix for inv_getsize
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-11-02 03:29:06
Subject: Re: Patches for REL7_0_PATCHES

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group