Re: 8.1 observation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.1 observation
Date: 2005-08-30 20:26:50
Message-ID: 24462.1125433610@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> writes:
> I just noticed that pronargs in pg_proc does not show the full arg
> count, seems only to show count of IN args.
> shouldn't this show the full arg count including in/out/inout?

There was some discussion of that just a day or so ago; so far no one's
come up with a reasonable suggestion for what the output should look like.

> Also is it ok to talk about the 8.1 beta in this list?

Beta testing is generally considered off-topic for -general; try -hackers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2005-08-30 22:25:43 Re: About "ERROR: must be *superuser* to COPY to or from
Previous Message Cristian Prieto 2005-08-30 19:28:11 Help with SPI...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-30 20:36:16 Re: Intermittent stats test failures on buildfarm
Previous Message Rocco Altier 2005-08-30 19:45:39 Re: Intermittent stats test failures on buildfarm