Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Date: 2002-04-25 01:08:00
Message-ID: 24441.1019696880@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Honetsly I don't understand what kind of example you
> expect. How about the following ?

> [The curren schema is schema1]

> begin;
> create schema foo;
> set search_path = foo;
> create table t1 (....);
> .
> [error occurs]
> rollback;
> insert into t1 select * from schema1.t1;

> Should the search_path be put back in this case ?

Sure it should be. Otherwise it's pointing at a nonexistent schema.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-04-25 01:10:26 Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-04-25 01:06:04 Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction