Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> btree_gist is essentially required for exclusion constraints to be
> useful in a practical way.
> In fact, can you submit it for the next commitfest to be included in
> core? That would allow range types and exclusion constraints to be used
> out-of-the-box in 9.2.
> Only if you think it's reasonable to put it in core, of course. If
> extensions are easy enough to install, maybe that's not really
btree_gist is entirely unready to be included in core.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2011-02-12 21:46:30|
|Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-02-12 21:42:17|
|Subject: Re: SQL/MED - file_fdw|
pgsql-rrreviewers by date
|Next:||From: Oleg Bartunov||Date: 2011-02-12 21:50:24|
|Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)|
|Previous:||From: Jeff Davis||Date: 2011-02-12 18:13:50|
|Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack