From:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: proposal: additional error fields
Date:
2012-05-02 00:13:05
Message-ID:
24403.1335917585@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2012-05-01 12:21:24 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-05-01 12:45:11 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2012-05-01 13:01:26 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-05-01 13:19:16 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2012-05-01 13:55:49 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-01 15:09:40 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2012-05-01 20:14:08 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-01 20:36:32 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2012-05-01 21:09:56 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2012-05-01 23:07:19 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2012-05-01 23:22:15 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-01 21:20:15 from "David Johnston" <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
2012-05-01 14:08:57 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2012-05-01 19:36:22 from Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
2012-05-01 19:59:49 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2012-05-01 20:09:17 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-02 00:05:07 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-05-02 00:13:05 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-02 01:01:48 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2012-05-02 07:23:29 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2012-05-02 13:17:06 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-02 14:16:48 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2012-05-02 14:23:17 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-02 14:51:41 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2012-05-02 22:36:19 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2012-05-02 00:32:58 from David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
2012-05-02 04:02:12 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-05-01 20:14:02 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2012-05-01 14:25:53 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-05-01 16:02:18 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-05-01 16:22:44 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-05-01 17:15:11 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-05-01 17:56:13 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I continue to maintain that the SQLSTATE is a much better basis for
>> solving this problem. Its categories are already pretty close to
>> what Peter needs: basically, IIUC, he wants to know about classes
>> 53, 58, maybe F0, and XX.
> This is really too mushy, IMHO.
I don't deny that we probably need to reclassify a few error cases, and
fix some elogs that should be ereports, before this approach would be
really workable. My point is that it's *close*, whereas "let's invent
some new error severities" is not close to reality and will break all
sorts of stuff.
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: David JohnstonDate: 2012-05-02 00:32:58Subject : Re: proposal: additional error fieldsPrevious :From : Robert HaasDate : 2012-05-02 00:05:07Subject : Re: proposal: additional error fields
