Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2
Date: 2006-12-20 16:24:02
Message-ID: 24395.1166631842@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I assume space waste will be mostly fixed when we have 0/1 byte headers
> for varlena data types.

Hardly.  int float timestamp etc types will all still have alignment issues.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-12-20 16:26:19
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-12-20 16:20:16
Subject: Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: fabio guidiDate: 2006-12-20 18:51:00
Subject: AGAIN - problem with BCC55 and libpq 8.2
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-12-20 16:20:16
Subject: Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group