Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch
Date: 2003-09-07 13:58:23
Message-ID: 24380.1062943103@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwinpgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Why does configure need to see those files?  Surely you don't need
> configure to test the capabilities of our own source tree?

Looking at the contents of src/include/port/win32, I would imagine the
problem is configure will decide we don't HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H, etc.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-cygwin by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-09-07 15:30:26
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-09-07 10:03:52
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-09-07 14:19:07
Subject: Re: Minor lmgr code cleanup
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-09-07 10:03:52
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-09-07 15:30:26
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-09-07 10:03:52
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group