From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch |
Date: | 2003-09-07 13:58:23 |
Message-ID: | 24380.1062943103@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Why does configure need to see those files? Surely you don't need
> configure to test the capabilities of our own source tree?
Looking at the contents of src/include/port/win32, I would imagine the
problem is configure will decide we don't HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H, etc.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-07 15:30:26 | Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-07 10:03:52 | Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-07 15:30:26 | Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-07 10:03:52 | Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-07 14:19:07 | Re: Minor lmgr code cleanup |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-07 10:03:52 | Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch |