| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | bruc(at)acm(dot)org |
| Cc: | peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, hubert(dot)froehlich(at)bvv(dot)bayern(dot)de |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #1208: Invalid page header |
| Date: | 2004-08-21 23:46:43 |
| Message-ID: | 24364.1093132003@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Robert E. Bruccoleri" <bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com> writes:
> I tried another load of the databases with fsync off (-F to
> the postmaster), and I encountered at least one invalid page
> header. Is there code in Postgres that handles the buffer cache
> differently if fsync is off?
I don't believe so.
You may care to read Joe Conway's recent tale of woe. Just because you
bought a pile of expensive hardware does not prove it's not a hardware
problem ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | 姜维 | 2004-08-22 01:39:07 | server crash in very big transaction [postgresql 8.0beta1] |
| Previous Message | Robert E. Bruccoleri | 2004-08-21 22:59:25 | Re: BUG #1208: Invalid page header |