Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?
Date: 2008-06-07 22:13:55
Message-ID: 24338.1212876835@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
>> etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
>> like "Never released".  Thoughts?

> I think a mention in the 8.3.3 notes saying something like "the 8.3.2
> version was never released to the public because it contained a bug"
> should be enough -- so all release note items should be for 8.3.3.

The implication being that our other releases *don't* contain bugs?

Seems a bit wordy to me, and anyway I just finished committing them
the other way ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-06-07 23:10:26
Subject: Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-06-07 21:40:17
Subject: Re: "Release date" for aborted releases?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group