Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I am wondering whether to leave the release note pages for 8.3.2, 8.2.8,
>> etc saying "Release date: 2008-06-09", or to change them to something
>> like "Never released". Thoughts?
> I think a mention in the 8.3.3 notes saying something like "the 8.3.2
> version was never released to the public because it contained a bug"
> should be enough -- so all release note items should be for 8.3.3.
The implication being that our other releases *don't* contain bugs?
Seems a bit wordy to me, and anyway I just finished committing them
the other way ...
regards, tom lane