Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Date: 2007-10-01 23:28:02
Message-ID: 24223.1191281282@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> I don't know much about what is involved in crafting these solutions, 
> but it seems we're close to beta and probably don't want to make drastic 
> changes to anything.  As such it seems to me that solving the problem 
> for analyze is a nice piece of low-hanging fruit that solves an 
> immediate problem that has been reported.

It's not as low-hanging as all that.  I'm not sure if you realized it,
but there was a whole lot of handwaving going in the earlier posts...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-01 23:35:36
Subject: Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-01 23:25:16
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group