| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
| Date: | 2007-10-01 23:28:02 |
| Message-ID: | 24223.1191281282@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> I don't know much about what is involved in crafting these solutions,
> but it seems we're close to beta and probably don't want to make drastic
> changes to anything. As such it seems to me that solving the problem
> for analyze is a nice piece of low-hanging fruit that solves an
> immediate problem that has been reported.
It's not as low-hanging as all that. I'm not sure if you realized it,
but there was a whole lot of handwaving going in the earlier posts...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-01 23:35:36 | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-01 23:25:16 | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |