Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2007/08/oracle-optimize.html

Not a whole lot of technical content there, but pretty interesting
nonetheless.  I *think* that the issues we're seeing are largely in the
NFS client-side kernel code, so bypassing that stack as Oracle is doing
might eliminate the problem.  Of course, there's a sizable amount of
code to be written to do that ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea at 2007-10-01 18:54:48 from Simon Riggs

Responses

• Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea at 2007-10-01 23:46:52 from Alvaro Herrera
• Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea at 2007-10-09 07:44:21 from Simon Riggs

pgsql-novice by date

Next:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2007-10-01 23:46:52
	Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-10-01 23:08:22
	Subject: Re: DST question

pgsql-docs by date

Next:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2007-10-01 23:46:52
	Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-10-01 18:54:48
	Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-10-01 23:28:02
	Subject: Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-10-01 23:14:21
	Subject: Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher