Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Mija Lee <mija(at)scharp(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Date: 2007-10-01 23:25:16
Message-ID: 24184.1191281116@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackerspgsql-novice
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2007/08/oracle-optimize.html

Not a whole lot of technical content there, but pretty interesting
nonetheless.  I *think* that the issues we're seeing are largely in the
NFS client-side kernel code, so bypassing that stack as Oracle is doing
might eliminate the problem.  Of course, there's a sizable amount of
code to be written to do that ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-10-01 23:46:52
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-01 23:08:22
Subject: Re: DST question

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-10-01 23:46:52
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-10-01 18:54:48
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-01 23:28:02
Subject: Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-01 23:14:21
Subject: Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group