Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Namely, that on platforms where malloc(0) returns NULL instead of
>> a pointer to a zero-size block, pg_malloc thinks it's a failure
>> and aborts the program.
> What's the use case for malloc(0) anyway?
See getAggregates() for an example. Yeah, we could add a special-case
code path for no aggregates, but it would be annoying and error-prone.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-10-01 14:49:29|
|Subject: Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-10-01 14:43:00|
|Subject: Re: WIP checksums patch|