Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Date: 2011-02-17 21:43:12
Message-ID: 24152.1297978992@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
I wrote:
> In any case, I was pointing to that as a reason that btree_gist wasn't
> ready to be in core.  It has nothing to do with KNN-ifying the module.
> I would like to see that happen before 9.1, else KNN will go out with
> not very many actual use-cases supported.

However, a larger reason for not applying that patch in a rush is that
it's almost certainly not up to speed for the recent extensions-related
changes.  Please note in particular that we are now expecting the
update-from-unpackaged script to produce the same catalog state as the
install script.  I just committed fixes to btree_gist's scripts to make
that actually true.  Any new additions to the opclasses will need to be
done in the same style.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-17 21:53:30
Subject: Re: Add support for logging the current role
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-17 21:42:32
Subject: Re: Replication server timeout patch

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2011-06-03 23:43:03
Subject: Get ready to get ready!
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-17 15:19:14
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group