Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>,pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...
Date: 2003-03-20 16:55:09
Message-ID: 24128.1048179309@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
>> Do you think we should replace them all with a utility called pg_maintain
>> that can do all of them?

> If you ask me, we could get rid of them completely because
> for d in $(psql -l --somthing); do vacuum $d; done
> seems perfectly fine.

If you have a real shell (and know how to use it), sure.  Is such a
solution acceptable to all those Windows users we're hoping to attract?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-03-20 16:58:25
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-03-20 16:48:33
Subject: Re: Faster NUMERIC implementation

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-03-20 16:58:25
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-03-20 16:22:01
Subject: Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group