Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement
Date: 2010-09-28 14:34:26
Message-ID: 24053.1285684466@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I looked on some constructs that helps with iteration over array in
> plpgsql. I propose a following syntax:

> FOR var IN [array variable | array expression]
> LOOP

I don't have any opinion about whether the functionality proposed here
is worth the trouble, but I do have an opinion about that syntax: it's
an awful choice. plpgsql has enough trouble already distinguishing
between integer for-loops and query for-loops, not to mention trouble
in producing a helpful error message when somebody gets either of those
constructs slightly wrong. Providing a variant where a single
expression can follow IN will make both of those problems an order of
magnitude worse. As an example, is this a for-in-query or a
for-in-array?

FOR v IN (SELECT arraycol FROM tab) LOOP ...

Either answer is plausible depending on whether you assume the
parentheses make it a subquery.

Pick something less easily confusable with the existing constructs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-09-28 14:41:18 Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-09-28 14:26:54 Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL