Justin Pitts <jpitts(at)bplglobal(dot)net> writes:
> On Jan 14, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The 100 temp table creations probably will do that just fine.
> Is there a way to verify this?
You could add an elog(LOG, "message") into ResetPlanCache so you could
tell when it had been called.
> I don't follow. Are you suggesting I begin another transaction on connection 1 with a read, and that
> would provoke the crash?
Yes. The rollback only sets the stage for the next transaction to try
to use a snapshot that isn't there anymore.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-14 16:11:03|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5276: pg_ctl reads data directory on -D instead of postgresql.conf directoryh |
|Previous:||From: Justin Pitts||Date: 2010-01-14 15:34:10|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5269: postgres backend terminates with SIGSEGV |