From:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc:
pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,
"Kevin Grittner" <Kgrittn(dot)CCAP(dot)Courts(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject:
Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4
Date:
2008-01-04 22:40:22
Message-ID:
23936.1199486422@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2008-01-04 18:16:13 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-04 22:16:53 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-04 22:40:22 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-04 22:44:27 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-04 22:29:32 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-04 22:42:16 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-04 22:46:59 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-04 22:51:27 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-04 23:45:21 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-05 00:01:12 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-05 00:46:15 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-05 03:09:30 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-05 23:38:38 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-07 16:07:24 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-04 23:29:30 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-07 01:20:10 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-07 15:01:50 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-17 16:44:16 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-17 18:30:51 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-17 19:35:01 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-17 22:25:36 from "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
2008-01-08 21:11:16 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-08 21:20:51 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2008-01-08 21:40:20 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-09 16:47:51 from Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2008-01-09 17:13:40 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2008-01-09 19:05:07 from Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2008-01-09 19:54:55 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> As I poked around at this, it started to seem familiar. I had
> previously posted about this query's performance under 8.2.4.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2007-10/msg00087.php
Well, that thread gave some of the missing details, such as
Table "public.ControlRecord"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------------------+------------------------+-----------
countyNo | "CountyNoT" | not null
but what the heck is "CountyNoT"?
It looks like 8.3 is failing to realize that it can propagate the
countyNo = 53 condition down to this table's scan, as 8.2 did;
but there's not enough details here to guess why not.
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2008-01-04 22:42:16
Subject : Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in8.3beta4
Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2008-01-04 22:29:32
Subject : Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4
pgsql-patches by date
Next :From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2008-01-04 22:42:16
Subject : Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in8.3beta4
Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2008-01-04 22:29:32
Subject : Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4