Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CVS in docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVS in docs
Date: 2010-09-22 13:46:46
Message-ID: 23848.1285163206@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.

> Agreed.

> What about the messages in configure?
> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL
> from CVS nor"

I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but
if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-09-22 14:07:22
Subject: Re: CVS in docs
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-09-22 12:05:26
Subject: Re: CVS in docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group