Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming a base backup from master

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming a base backup from master
Date: 2010-09-03 15:47:45
Message-ID: 23812.1283528865@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> In any case, it's certainly not something required for an initial
>> implementation..
 
> No disagreement there; but sometimes it pays to know where you might
> want to go, so you don't do something to make further development in
> that direction unnecessarily difficult.

I think that setting out to reimplement rsync, or to go down a design
path where we're likely to do a lot of that eventually, is the height
of folly.  We should be standing on the shoulders of other projects,
not rolling our own because of misguided ideas about people not having
those projects installed.

IOW, what I'd like to see is protocol extensions that allow an external
copy of rsync to be invoked; not build in rsync, or tar, or anything
else that we could get off-the-shelf.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-03 15:53:06
Subject: Re: Streaming a base backup from master
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-03 15:43:50
Subject: Re: Interruptible sleeps (was Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers!)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group