| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Group Commit |
| Date: | 2007-03-29 16:57:29 |
| Message-ID: | 23792.1175187449@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is where my bogometer triggered. There's way too many platforms
>> where 1 msec timeout is a sheer fantasy. If you cannot make it perform
>> well with a 10-msec timeout then I don't think it's going to be at all
>> portable.
> The 1 ms timeout isn't essential for the algorithm.
OK, but when you get to performance testing, please see how well it
works at CONFIG_HZ=100.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-03-29 17:22:55 | CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY and HOT |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-03-29 16:42:04 | Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design |