Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] add CLUSTER table ORDER BY index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Holger Schurig <holgerschurig(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add CLUSTER table ORDER BY index
Date: 2007-03-28 13:48:33
Message-ID: 23745.1175089713@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Though I don't think we're implementing "CLUSTER table ORDER BY col1, 
> col2" anytime soon, ORDER BY does imply that a list of columns is to 
> follow. How about "CLUSTER table USING index"?

+1 ... AFAIR there was 0 discussion of the exact syntax before,
so I don't feel wedded to ORDER BY.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-03-28 14:59:25
Subject: Re: autovacuum: multiple workers
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-03-28 13:39:47
Subject: Re: autovacuum: multiple workers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group