Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,"pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)
Date: 2002-12-20 18:02:58
Message-ID: 23730.1040407378@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-odbc
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It is easy to determine what tag to return?  Remember the discussion on
> rules and that only the original tag should be returned.  Is there
> always one obvious tag to an execute?

I would think we'd do it via the rule that we return the same thing
you'd get if you directly issued the query that appears as the body
of the PREPARE command.  All the special cases for rules and so on
seem to apply the same way if you do that.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-12-20 18:05:39
Subject: Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)
Previous:From: Jeroen T. VermeulenDate: 2002-12-20 18:02:39
Subject: Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-12-20 18:05:39
Subject: Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)
Previous:From: Jeroen T. VermeulenDate: 2002-12-20 18:02:39
Subject: Re: EXECUTE status (was Re: [ODBC] About server side prepare)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group