Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston
Date: 2004-10-07 20:46:35
Message-ID: 23649.1097181995@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> Is there some way to mark this kind of stuff on the TODO
> list?  Right now things are marked, essentially, "might get done
> eventually," and "handled in the coming release."  Maybe some marker
> like "slated for version m.n" would be good. :)

If we actually had such a schedule and people paid to meet it, such
markings might mean something.  The truth of the matter is that the
TODO list is just a collection of things that some people think might
be good things to work on eventually.  Reading more into it than that
is a mistake, because there is no schedule.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-07 20:55:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-07 20:43:53
Subject: Re: DDL triggers [was Re: database constraints]

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-07 20:55:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-10-07 20:21:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group