From:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>,Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)tr(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker
Date:
2003-01-04 01:08:03
Message-ID:
23571.1041642483@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2002-12-31 17:20:58 from Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)tr(dot)net>
2002-12-31 17:38:29 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2002-12-31 17:49:29 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2002-12-31 19:17:46 from Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
2002-12-31 19:26:09 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2002-12-31 17:50:20 from Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)tr(dot)net>
2002-12-31 17:51:02 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2002-12-31 18:04:13 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-01 23:02:12 from mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
2003-01-01 23:09:35 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-01 23:41:29 from mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
2003-01-01 23:44:58 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-02 04:17:59 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-02 04:27:59 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-02 12:52:13 from Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
2003-01-02 14:59:23 from Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2003-01-02 16:44:56 from Dennis Björklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
2003-01-02 23:49:43 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-03 00:33:43 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-03 15:35:35 from Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
2003-01-02 23:07:52 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2003-01-02 23:20:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-02 23:52:27 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-03 17:30:16 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2003-01-04 00:43:45 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-04 01:08:03 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2003-01-04 01:33:47 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> But it is a "sect1" in libpq. It should be a "sect1" somewhere that
> makes more sense.
> ...
> It doesn't belong in libpq, and it doesn't belong in the Programmer's
> Guide.
How could it not belong in libpq? But you are right that the
Programmer's Guide seems the wrong place for information that is
important to end-users.
Perhaps libpq needs to have a chapter in the User's Guide as well as a
chapter in the Programmer's Guide? Or maybe we could put the relevant
information into a reference page under PostgreSQL Client Applications
(titled something along the line of "common behavior of all libpq-based
client applications").
regards, tom lane
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-01-04 01:19:20Subject : Re: Upgrading rant. Previous :From : Bruce MomjianDate : 2003-01-04 00:43:45Subject : Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker
