Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)
Date: 2006-10-24 21:05:16
Message-ID: 23550.1161723916@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> Why not? The shipped tarball would contain exactly the same
>> pg_config.h.win32 it does today; the only difference is that
>> the version info would've been inserted automatically instead
>> of manually.

> Right. And then you can only build from tarball and not from CVS, right?

But isn't that true for borland already? We've got the .def files
for libpq and the help-file for psql that we don't expect a borland
environment to be able to build.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-10-24 21:06:41 Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-24 20:59:41 Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)